Hepatic sarcoidosis Scientific features and also result

From World News
Revision as of 09:49, 29 October 2024 by Iraqwinter29 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "BACKGROUND The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) after foot or ankle surgery remains high, despite the implementation of antibiotic prophylaxis. Recently, guidelines sug...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

BACKGROUND The rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) after foot or ankle surgery remains high, despite the implementation of antibiotic prophylaxis. Recently, guidelines suggest a single dose of 2 g instead of 1 g of cefazolin for implant surgery; this decision is largely based on pharmacokinetic studies. However, the clinical effect of this higher dose has never been investigated in foot and ankle surgery. This retrospective cohort study investigated the effect of 2 g compared with 1 g of prophylactic cefazolin on the incidence of SSIs in foot and ankle surgery. METHODS All patients undergoing trauma-related surgery of the foot, ankle, or lower leg between September 2015 and March 2019 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of an SSI. SSIs were compared between patients receiving 1 g and 2 g of cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis, using a propensity score to correct for possible confounders. RESULTS A total of 293 patients received 1 g and 126 patients received 2 g of cefazolin. The overall number of SSIs was 19 (6.5%) in the 1-g group and 6 (4.8%) in the 2-g group. Corrected for possible confounders, this was not statistically significant (OR, 0.770; P = .608). CONCLUSION Even though the decrease in SSI rate from 6.5% to 4.8% was found not to be statistically significant, it might be clinically relevant considering the reduction in morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Research linking pharmacokinetic and clinical results of prophylactic cefazolin is needed to establish whether or not the current recommendations and guidelines are sufficient for preventing SSIs in foot and ankle surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective comparative series.BACKGROUND Investigating survival in cervical cancer at the local level is crucial to determine the effectiveness of overall management, as it reflects the level of care provided and awareness among the population about screening and early diagnosis. OBJECTIVES Analyze overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) among patients treated for cervical cancer and to investigate clinical, management- and outcome-related independent factors associated with survival. DESIGN A retrospective medical record review. SETTING Gynecology oncology unit in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS AND METHODS All women with cervical cancer who were treated and followed up between January 1999 and December 2017. Baseline demographic and clinical data, tumor characteristics, treatment options and outcomes including recurrence were collected and analyzed as factors and predictors of survival. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES OS and DFS among patients treated for cervical cancer. SAMPLE SIZE 190 patients. RESULTS The 190 patients had a meaval was about 8 years in our institution, which is predicted by the tumor grade, regional organs involved and recurrence. Remarkably, this study found a high percentage of patients diagnosed at an advanced stage, which probably impacts survival and stresses the need for improving early detection. PF-9366 purchase LIMITATIONS Retrospective design, resulting in recall bias and missing data. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None.BACKGROUND Crohn's disease (CD) is a serious cause of perianal disease and the incidence is increasing in Saudi Arabia. MR imaging may document specific features that may help to foresee Crohn's disease in patients making an initial presentation. OBJECTIVE Present MR imaging findings of perianal fistulas in patients making an initial presentation. DESIGN Retrospective, observational. SETTING Radiology clinic in in Dhahran. PATIENTS AND METHODS All previously undiagnosed and untreated patients who presented for the first time to the outpatient clinics from September 2015-2018 with perianal fistulas were retrospectively evaluated. Previously diagnosed CD patients, post-surgical or intervention cases were excluded. Fistulas were categorized as low or high anal, simple or complex, and were graded per St. James University Hospital Classification. Imaging was interpreted by two experienced readers based on the Van Assche score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Fistula features on MR imaging and diagnosis of CD. SAMPLE SIZE 171 patients. RESULTS Of 171 patients, 139 (81.3%) were males with mean age of 37.2 (12.7) years; the 32 females had a mean age of 35.8 (10.6) years. Twenty-one patients (12.3%) had CD. Fourteen (40.4%) patients with complex fistulas had CD in comparison to only 5 (4.8%) simple fistula patients ( P=.0005). More than half of patients with complex and high anal fistulas had CD ( P=.0005). Females were more affected than males ( P=.0005). CONCLUSION Complex or high anal fistula on MR imaging may be the initial presentation of CD and warrant further work up to establish the diagnosis. LIMITATIONS Retrospective, small sample, single center, and short duration study. CONFLICT OF INTEREST None.BACKGROUND Hammertoe correction is perhaps the most common elective surgery performed in the foot, yet rates of symptomatic recurrence and revision surgery can be high. In this study, we aimed to identify patient and provider risk factors associated with failure after hammertoe surgery. METHODS Consecutive patients with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up undergoing hammertoe surgery within a single, urban foot and ankle practice between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2013, served as the basis of this retrospective cohort study. Cox regression analysis was used to identify important predictor variables obtained through chart and radiographic review. One hundred fifty-two patients (311 toes) with a mean age of 60.8 ± 11.2 years and mean follow-up of 29.5 ± 21.2 months were included. RESULTS Statistically significant predictors of failure were having a larger preoperative transverse plane deviation of the digit (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 for each degree; P less then .001; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.04), operating on the second toe (vs third or fourth) (HR, 2.23; P = .003; 95% CI, 1.31, 3.81), use of a phalangeal osteotomy to reduce the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint (HR, 2.77; P = .005; 95% CI, 1.36, 5.64), and using less common/conventional operative techniques to reduce the PIP joint (HR, 2.62; P = .03; 95% CI, 1.09, 6.26). Concomitant performance of first ray surgery reduced hammertoe recurrence by 50% (HR, 0.51; P = .01; 95% CI, 0.30, 0.87). CONCLUSION We identified risk factors that may provide guidance for surgeons during preoperative hammertoe surgery consultations. This information may better equip patients with appropriate postoperative expectations when contemplating surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective case series.