Cutaneous metastasis via intestinal adenocarcinoma involving not known major source

The added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer ((B)RPC) is unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with radiotherapy.
A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline (ovidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The primary endpoint was pooled median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included resection rate, R0 resection rate, and other pathologic outcomes.
We included 512 patients with (B)RPC from 15 studies, of which 7 were prospective nonrandomized studies. In total, 351 patients (68.6%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX alone (8 studies) and 161 patients (31.4%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX and radiotherapy (7 studies). The pooled estimated median OS was 21.6 months (range 18.4-34.0 months) for FOLFIRINOX alone and 22.4 months (range 11.0-37.7 months) for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy. The pooled resection rate was similar (71.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.43) and the pooled R0 resection rate was higher for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy (88.0% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.045). Other pathological outcomes (ypN0, pathologic complete response, perineural invasion) were comparable.
In this meta-analysis, radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with an improved R0 resection rate as compared with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone, but a difference in survival could not be demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to determine the added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (B)PRC.
In this meta-analysis, radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with an improved R0 resection rate as compared with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone, but a difference in survival could not be demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to determine the added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (B)PRC.Health care equality is an idealistic goal that is difficult to achieve. However, uplifting the quality of care in surgery for cancer is achievable through several means, the most important of which is training of surgeons through properly structured training programs. However, such programs vary greatly, and no uniformity of curriculum exists throughout the world. On the other hand, several avenues are available for uplifting the quality of care through education and dissemination of knowledge at an individual level, an institutional level, a national level, and an international level. Efforts to uplift the quality of surgical care at an individual level can be by direct delivery of care or by dissemination of knowledge and experiences through personal interactions, lectures, and published works. Conferences, webinars, and travel grants are effective means offered by several institutions and national professional organizations. At an international level, however, much more can be done. For example, in the specialty of head and neck surgery, the International Federation of Head and Neck Oncologic Societies (IFHNOS) has done extraordinary work through world congresses, world tour programs, master courses on operative techniques, and its most impactful program, the Global On Line Fellowship in head and neck surgery and oncology. CCS-1477 datasheet The programs offered by IFHNOS have had a huge impact on the quality of surgical care for head and neck cancer worldwide. This prototype can be used in many other specialties of surgical oncology to uplift the quality of care globally.
Axillary pathologic complete response (pCR) confers higher overall and recurrence-free survival than residual axillary disease. Although breast pCR (ypT0) is associated with a pathologically negative axilla (ypN0) in human epidermal growth factor receptor2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), how clinical T (cT) and N (cN) staging are associated with ypN0 in other tumor subtypes is incompletely understood.
A single-institution cancer registry was retrospectively reviewed for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery from 2010 to 2018. Fisher's exact tests compared proportion of breast and axillary pCR by tumor subtype (hormone receptor[HR]-positive /HER2-,HR+/HER2+,HR-/HER2+,HR-/HER2-). Logistic regression determined factors associated with ypN0. Sensitivity analyses determined how cN status affected ypN status by tumor subtype.
The study enrolled 1348 patients. The median age was 54 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44-63 years), and 55% of the patients TNBC (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.03-0.40; p = 0.001).
Tumor subtype, clinical stage, and age at diagnosis may be important in consideration of de-escalation of axillary staging.
Tumor subtype, clinical stage, and age at diagnosis may be important in consideration of de-escalation of axillary staging.Based on census data, over one-third of the US population identifies as a racial or ethnic minority. This group of racial and ethnic minorities is more likely to develop cancer and die from it when compared with the general population of the USA. These disparities are most pronounced in the African American community. Despite overall CRC rates decreasing nationally and within certain racial and ethnic minorities in the USA, there continue to be disparities in incidence and mortality when compared with non-Hispanic Whites. The disparities in CRC incidence and mortality are related to systematic racism and bias inherent in healthcare systems and society. Disparities in CRC management will continue to exist until specific interventions are implemented in the context of each racial and ethnic group. This review's primary aim is to highlight the disparities in CRC among African Americans in the USA. For surgeons, understanding these disparities is formative to creating change and improving the quality of care, centering equity for all patients.
Staging is inaccurate for cT2N0 esophageal cancer, and patients often are clinically mis-staged. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome after upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, considering the impact of clinical "mis-staging."
This study reviewed patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma (ADK) of the esophagus who underwent upfront surgery (S group) or neoadjuvant treatment (chemoradiotherapy [CRT] group) for cT2N0 cancer. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. Correctly staged (cTNM = pTNM), understaged (cTNM < pTNM), and overstaged (cTNM > pTNM) patients in the S group and the CRT group were analyzed. Risk factors for unexpected lymph-node involvement were identified in the S group and for cancer-related death in the whole study cohort.
The study enrolled 229 patients with cT2N0 esophageal cancer. The 5-year OS rate was 34.2% in the S group versus 55.7% in the CRT group (p = 0.0088). The DFS also was significantly higher (p = 0.